Technology independent assessment of professional competence
Abstract The purpose of this work was development of independent assessment technology of specialists with medical and pharmaceutical education competence with use of the international experience. In furtherance of this goal such mechanisms as the objective structured clinical examination, the analysis of professional standards in health care and also original grading system (in penalty points) with use of an expert assessment electronic sheets were offered. The main indicators of assessment have been developed during the professional examination taking into account a different direction, the forms and control methods including testing and expert assessment are chosen. Grading results on multimark self-developing system can be converted into assessment on any scale, including on classical for Russia – 5-mark, using similar approach for end-of-year examinations. A conversion of technical points in traditional assessment can be made by means of a rating (serial) or integrated (absolute) scale.
Keywords:accreditation examination, evaluation criteria, objective structured clinical examination, preparedness level of competency matrix, simulation, expert assessment electronic sheets
Clin. Experiment. Surg. Petrovsky J. 2016. № 3. Р. 111–117.
Received: 15.07.2016. Accepted: 15.08.2016.
References
1. The concept of modernization of Russian education for the period till 2010. Vestnik obrazovaniya [Journal of Education]. 2002; Vol. 6: 11–40. (in Russian)
2. The concept of development of the health system in the Russian Federation until 2020. Mode of access: http://nrma.ru/Reform/zdr_conception_2020.shtml. (in Russian)
3. The concept of the Federal target program of education development for 2006–2010. Approved by the Government of the Russian Federation dated 03.09.2005 (1340-r).Vestnik obrazovaniya [Journal of Education]. 2005; Vol. 22: 7–40. (in Russian)
4. Amirov N.X., Sozinov A.S., Mukharyamova L.M., Bulatov S. A. Actors instead of patients. Meditsinskaya gazeta [Medical Newspaper]. N 3. 14.05.2008: 10. (in Russian)
5. Sozinov A. S., Bulatov S. A. Virtual patient – a look into the fu- ture or a toy for intellectuals? Virtual'nye tekhnologii v meditsine [Virtual Technologies in Medicine]. 2010; Vol. 1 (3): 19–24. (in Russian)
6. Simulation training in medicine, ROSOMED (the Russian- society of simulation training in medicine) / under the editorship of A.A. Svistunov; соmp. M.D. Gorshkov. Moscow: Publishing house of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2013. (in Russian)
7. Balkizov Z. Z. Continuous medical education. The use of simulation technologies in hospitals. Zdravookhranenie [Healthcare]. 2011; Vol. 10: 44–9. (in Russian)
8. Simulation training in anesthesiology and reanimatology / comp. M.D. Gorshkov, ed. by V.V. Moroz, E.A. Evdokimov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2014. 312 p. (in Russian)
9. Simulation training: obstetrics, gynecology, perinatology, pediatrics / comp. M.D. Gorshkov, ed. by G.T. Sukhikh. Moscow: ROSOMED, 2015: 232 p. (in Russian)
10. Simulation training in surgery / ed. by V.A. Kubyshkin, S.I. Yemelyanov, M.D. Gorshkov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2014: 264 p. (in Russian)
11. Harden R.M., Gleeson F.A. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979; Vol. 13 (1): 41–54.
12. Holmboe E.S. Faculty and the observation of trainees’ clinical skills: problems and opportunities. Simul Healthc. 2014; Vol. 9 (1): 21–32.
13. Issenberg S.B., McGaghie W.C., Petrusa E.R., Lee Gordon D., Scalese R.J. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; Vol. 27 (1): 10–28.
14. Kang K., Tolhurst-Cleaver S., White S., Simpson W. Simulation in healthcare education. The establishment of a program of simulation education: AMEE Guide N 50 (transl. from English, ed. by Z.Z. Balkizov). Meditsinskoe obrazovanie i professional'noe razvitie [Medical Education and Professional Development] 2011; Vol. 3: 26–65. Mode of access: http://medobr.ru/jarticles/28.html?SSr=05013305c104664800c327c__66479517. (in Russian)
15. Merkur S., Mladovsky P., Mossialos E., McKee M. Is the continuous learning and recertification to maintain the necessary professional level of doctors? A brief analytical review. The WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2008. 38 p. Mode of access: <url> http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/ 0003/78951/ E92150R.pdf. (in Russian)
16. Nestel D., et al. Confederates in Health Care Simulations: Not as Simple as It Seems. Clin Simul Nurs. 2014; Vol. 10 (Issue 12): 611–6.