Analysis of the systemic inflammatory response in the application of various techniques of cardiopulmonary bypass
Abstract
The article presents the results of original research of various techniques cardiopulmonary bypass
used in cardiac surgery clinic in District Clinicl Hospital in Tver region. We analyzed the systemic
inflammatory response in application of various techniques of cardiopulmonary bypass. Also we
analyzed the performance level of the inflammatory systemic response of the organism and central
hemodynamic system during direct myocardial revascularization on a beating heart, and by using
different types of cardiopulmonary bypass.
Keywords:cardiopulmonary bypass, MECC perfusion, systemic inflammatory response
Clin. Experiment. Surg. Petrovsky J. 2017; 5 (1): 78–83.
Received: 01.11.2016. Accepted: 13.12.2016.
References
1. Bokeria L.A., Samuilov D.Sh.., Shvedunova V.N. et al. Markers of inflammatory response after radical correction of congenital
heart defects in the conditions of cardiopulmonary bypass. Grudnaya
i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya [Thoracic and Cardiovascular Sur-
gery]. 2003; (3): 27–35. (in Russian)
2. Matveev Y.G., Najjar M.H. Redkoborodaya A.A., et al. Influence biocompatibility perfusion circuit on biochemical criteria for
assessing the systemic inflammatory response. Vestnik transplan-
tologhii i iskusstvennykh organov [Bulletin of Transplantology and
Artificial Organs]. 2006; (2): 44–7. (in Russian)
3. Day J.R.S., Taylor K.M. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome and cardiopulmonary bypass. Int J Surg. 2005; Vol. 3 (2): 129–40.
4. Diegeler A., Doll N., Rauch T. et al. Humoral immune response
during coronary artery bypass grafting: A comparison of limited approach, «off-pump» technique, and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 2000; Vol. 102 (19): 95–100.
5. Holmes IV J.H. et al. Magnitude of the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass and its relation to adverse clinical
outcomes. Inflamm Res. 2002; Vol. 51 (12): 579–86.
6. Babaev M.A. The syndrome of multiple organ failure after
cardiovascular operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. Diss. Moscow, 2011. (in Russian)
7. Larmann J., Theilmeier G. Inflammatory response to cardiac surgery: cardiopulmonary bypass versus non-cardiopulmonary
bypass surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004; Vol. 18 (3):
425–38.
8. Matata B.M., Sosnowski A.W., Galinanes M. Off-pump bypass
graft operation significantly reduces oxidative stress and inflammation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; Vol. 69 (3): 785–91.
9. Mu Y.L., et al. Method of anesthesia and perioperative management for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chinese.
2008; Vol. 20 (4): 207–9.
10. Nesher N., et al. Higher levels of serum cytokines and myocardial tissue markers during onpump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg. 2006; Vol. 21: 395–402.
11. Babaev M.A., A.A. Eremenko, Minbolatova N.M., Dzemeshkevich S.L. Sindrom multiple organ failure in patients after surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Khirurghia. Zhournal
im. N.I. Pirogova [Surgery. The journal named after N.I. Pirogov].
2013; (2): 119–23. (in Russian)
12. Coronary scoring and inflammatory markers in coronary
artery disease patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2005; Vol. 355, suppl:
S85.
13. Goetze J.P., Christoffersen C., Perko M., et al. Increased
cardiac BNP expression associated with myocardial ischemia.
FASEB J Express Article. 2003; Vol. 17 (9): 1105–07.
14. Raja S.G., Berg G.A. Impact of off-pump coronary artery
bypass surgery on systemic inflammation: current best available
evidence. J Cardiol. Surg. 2007. Vol. 22, N 5. P. 445–455.
15. McGuinness J., Bouchier-Hayes D., Redmond J.M. Understanding the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery. Surgeon.
2008; 6 (3): 162–71.
16. Parolari A. et al. Systemic inflammation after on-pump
and off-pump coronary bypass surgery: a one-month follow-up. Ann
Thorac Surg. 2007; (84): 823–8.
17. Warren O.J. et al. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 2 – anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009; 23 (3): 384–93.