To the content
3 . 2017

Ethical issues of experimental surgery: «head transplant» case

Abstract

The article discusses a number of fundamental anthropological and ethical problems of experimental surgery which arise in moral assessment of the surgent S. Canavero “head transplantation” project. It is noted that the project is based on the assumption (contested by the modern neuroscience) that human consciousness is exclusively a function of its brain. Therefore, it is presumed that the “head transplantion” would not change the recipient’s identity and self-consciousness. For the moral assessment of S. Canavero’s project, a standard set of bioethical principles for evaluation of medical innovations was used: the principle of beneficence and non-maleficence (do no harm!); the principle of autonomy; the principle of human dignity; the principle of justice. The article also discusses the phenomenon of “theatricalization of medicine”, expressed in the aggressive way in which S. Canavero uses media to promote his project. A conclusion is made about the fundamental importance of professional ethical expertise for the evaluation of innovative projects in experimental surgery.

  

Keywords:head transplant, experimental surgery ethics, bioethical principles, mind-body problem, theatralization of medicine

Clin. Experiment. Surg. Petrovsky J. 2017; 5 (3): 81–9.

DOI: 10.24411/2308-1198-2017-00049

Received: 30.04.2017. Accepted: 15.06.2017. 

References

1. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999. 640 p.

2. Metzinger Th. Hirnforschung, Neurotechnologie, Bewubt- seinskultur. Medizin-ethische, anthropologische und sozialphi- losophische Fragen der Zukunft. URL: http://www.philosophie.unimainz.de/metzinger/publikationen/1996p.html (date of access: March 1, 2017)

3. McDonald P.J., Kulkarni A.V., Farrokhyar F., Bhandari M. Ethical issues in surgical research. Can J Surg. 2010; 53 (2): 133–6.

4. Morreim E.H., Mack M., Sade R.M. Is surgical innovation too dangerous to remain unregulated? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82: 1957–65.

5. Mitu F., Turiceanu M., Gaitan A. Heart transplantation – ethical considerations. Rom J Bioethics. 2011; Vol. 9 (4): 109.

6. Experiments on the revitalization of the organism [video]. Script writer and scientific consultant S.S. Bryukhonenko, director D.I. Yashin. Moscow, 1940. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDqh-r8TQgs (date of access: March 3, 2017) (in Russian)

7. Shevchenko R. Sergei Got’e doesn’t see any prospects in the body transplantation. URL: http://www.medvestnik.ru/content/news/Sergei-Gote-ne-vidit-perspektiv-v-peresadke-tela.html (date of access: March 3, 2017). (in Russian)

8. Sergio Canavero’s team took another step towards a head transplant. URL: http://www.medvestnik.ru/content/news/Koman-da-Serdjio-Kanavero-sdelala-eshe-odin-shag-k-peresadke-golovy.html (date of access: March 3, 2017) (in Russian)

9. Francis D., Moore F.D. Ethical problems special to surgery: surgical teaching, surgical innovation, and the surgeon in managed care. Arch Surg. 2000; 135 (1): 14–6. 

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITOR
CHIEF EDITOR
Sergey L. Dzemeshkevich
MD, Professor (Moscow, Russia)

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»