References
1. Egiev V.N., Voskresenskiy P.K., Emel’yanov S.I. Non-stretching hernioplasty. Moscow: Medpraktika-M, 2002: 147. (in Russian)
2. Sedov M.V., Tarbaev S.D., Gostevskiy A.A. Effectiveness of hernioplasty using a polypropylene mesh implant in the treatment of postoperative ventral hernias. Vestnik khirurgii [Bulletin of Sur- gery]. 2005; (3): 85–7. (in Russian)
3. Coda A., Lamberti R., Martorana S. Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial. Hernia. 2012; 16: 9–20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0868-z.
4. Todros S., Pavan P.G., Pachera P., Natali A.N. Synthetic surgical meshes used in abdominal wall surgery: Part I – materials and structural conformation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017; 105 (4): 892–903. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33586.
5. Falcao S.C., Coelho A.R., Evencio Neto J. Biomechanical evaluation of microbial cellulose (Zoogloea sp.) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes as implants in repair of produced abdominal wall defects in rats // Acta Cir. Bras. 2008. Vol. 23, N 3. P. 184-191. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000200012.
6. Dahman Y. Nanostructured biomaterials and biocomposites from bacterial cellulose nanofibers // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2009. Vol. 9, N 9. P. 5105-5122. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19928189.
7. Gromovyh T.I., Fan Mi Han’, Birjukov E.G., Danil’chuk T.N., et al. Prospects for the use of bacterial cellulose in meat products. M’asnaya industriya [Meat Industry]. 2013; (4): 32–5. (in Russian)
8. Hioki N., Hori Y., Watanabe K., Morinaga Y. et al. Bacterial cellulose as a new material for papermaking // Jpn. TAPPI J. 1995. Vol. 49. P. 718-723.
9. Iguchi M., Yamanaka S., Budhiono A. Bacterial cellulose - a masterpiece of nature’s arts // J. Mater. Sci. 2000. Vol. 35. P. 261- 270. URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004775229149.
10. Saska S., Barud H.S., Gaspar A.M.M., Marchetto R. et al. Bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites for bone regeneration // Int. J. Biomater. 2011. Vol. 2011. Article ID 175362. P. 1-8. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/175362.
11. Klemm D., Schumann D., Udhard U., Marsch S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose: artificial blood vessels for microsurgery // Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001. Vol. 26, N 9. P. 1561-1603. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-1.
12. Brown E.E., Laborie M.-P.G., Zhang J. Glutaraldehyde treatment of bacterial cellulose/fibrin composites: impact on morphology, tensile and viscoelastic properties // Cellulose. 2012. Vol. 19. P. 127-137. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9617-9.
13. Wippermann J., Schumann D., Klemm D., Kosmehl H. et al. Preliminary results of small arterial substitute performed with a new cylindrical biomaterial composed of bacterial cellulose // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. 2009. Vol. 37, N 5. P. 592-596. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.01.007.
14. Schumann D., Wippermann J., Klemm D. et al. Artificial vascular implants from bacterial cellulose: preliminary results of small arterial substitutes // Cellulose. 2009. Vol. 16. P. 877-885. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9264-y.
15. Fink H., Faxalv L., Molnar G.F., Drotz K. et al. Real-time measurements of coagulation on bacterial cellulose and conventional vascular graft materials // Acta Biomater. 2010. Vol. 6. P. 1125- 1130. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19800035.
16. Czaja W., Krystynowicz A., Kawecki M., Wysota K. et al. Biomedical applications of microbial cellulose in burn wound recovery // Cellulose: Molecular and Structural Biology. Dordrecht : Springer, 2007. P. 307-321. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4020-5380-1_17.
17. Fu L. ,Zhang J., Yang G. Presentstatus and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair // Carbohydr. Polym. 2013. Vol. 92. P. 1432-1442. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.071. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23399174.
18. Nimeskern L., Avila HM., Sundberg J. et al. Mechanical evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose as an implant material for ear cartilage replacement // J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013. Vol. 22. P. 12-21. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.005.
19. Kowalska-Ludwicka K., Cala J., Grobelski B., Sygut D. et al. Modified bacterial cellulose tubes for regeneration of damaged peripheral nerves // Arch. Med. Sci. 2013. Vol. 9. P. 527-534. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701969.
20. Portal O., Clark W.A., Levinson D.J. Microbial cellulose wound dressing in the treatment of nonhealing lower extremity ulcers // Wounds. 2009. Vol. 21, N 1. P. 1-3. URL: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25904579.
21. Solway D.R., Clark W.A., Levinson D.J. A parallel open-label trial to evaluate microbial cellulose wound dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers // Int. Wound J. 2011. Vol. 8, N 1. P. 69-73. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21159127.
22. Rosen C.L., Steinberg G.K., DeMonte F., Delashaw J.B. Jr et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial evaluating a biosynthesized cellulose graft for repair of dural defects // Neurosurgery. 2011. Vol. 69, N 5. P. 1093-1103. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21670715.
23. Melo da Fonte J.B., Valido D.P., Filho L.X. et al. Otoliths/ bacterial cellulose nanocomposite as a potential dental pulp capping biomaterial in canine model // Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2015. Vol. 120. P. 105. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.02.469.
24. Amorim W.L., Costa H.O., de Souza F.C. et al. Estudo experimental da resposta tecidual a presenca de celulose produzida por Acetobacter xylinum no dorso nasal de coelhos // Braz. J. Otorhino- laryngol. 2009. Vol. 75. P. 200-207. URL: http://www.redalyc.org/html/3924/392437883008.
25. Hui Jia, Yuanyuan Jia, Jiao Wang, Yuan Hu et al. Poten- tiality of bacterial cellulose as the scaffold of tissue engineering of cornea // Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI 2009). Tianjin, China, 2009. doi: 10.1109/BMEI.2009.5305657.
26. Stoica-Guzun A., Stroescu M., Tache F., Zaharescu T. et al. Effect of electron beam irradiation on bacterial cellulose membranes used as transdermal drug delivery systems // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2007. Vol. 265. P. 434-438. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.09.036.
27. Trovatti E., Silva N.H., Duarte I.F., Rosado C.F. et al. Biocellulose membranes as supports for dermal release of lidocaine //Biomacromol. 2011. Vol. 12. P. 4162-4168. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999108.
28. Muller A., Ni Z., Hessler N., Wesarg F. et al. The biopolymer bacterial nanocellulose as drug delivery system: investigation of drug loading and release using the model protein albumin // J. Pharm. Sci. 2013. Vol. 102, N 2. P. 579-592. URL: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23192666.
29. Maria L.C.S., Santos A.L.C., Oliveira P.C., Valle A.S.S. et al. Preparation and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles impregnated in bacterial cellulose // Polimeros Ciencia Tecnologia. 2010. Vol. 20, N 1. P. 72-77. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104- 14282010005000001.
30. Patent RF N 2597291, MPK S12N 1/22, C12P 19/04. Method for producing bacterial cellulose / Budaeva V.V., Gladysheva E.K., Skiba E.A., Sakovich G.V. N 2015129304/10; zayavl. 16.07.2015; opubl. 10.09.2016, Byul. N 25. P. 9. (in Russian)
31. Sakovich G.V., Skiba E.A., Budaeva V.V., Gladysheva E.K., et al. Technological basis for obtaining bacterial nanocellulose from raw materials with zero cost. Doklady Akademii nauk [Reports of the Academy of Sciences]. 2017; 477 (1): 109–12. (in Russian)