The influence of sex-correlation between donors and recipients on the state of morphology in allografted kidneys
Abstract
Aim – to clarify whether recipient’s and donor’s sex influence the morphology of allografted kidneys from living relative donors (LRD).
Patients and methods. Сohort of 285 patients with LRD kidneys was analyzed. Cohort consisted of 134 females and 151 males. Patients’ age 1–63 years (21.3±12.32). There were 144 children and 141 adults. There were 169 female donors and 116 male donors. For comparative analysis we performed statistical analysis with the help of statistical program Statistica (Vers. 10). For comparison of four independent groups was used H-criterion of Cruskell–Wolles.
Results. To provide statistical analysis all the patients were divided in 2 groups: female recipients and male recipients, and then in 4 subgroups depending donors’ and recipients’ sex. Comparative analysis has demonstrated, that better state of morphology was in the group of female recipients.
Conclusion. Тhe results of related kidney transplantations in female recipients were much better than in male recipients.
Keywords:kidney transplantation, acute rejection, immunosuppression
Clin Experiment Surg. Petrovsky J. 2018; 6 (4): 62–5.
doi: 10.24411/2308-1198-2018-14009. Received: 09.07.2018. Accepted: 24.10.2018.
References
1. Poggio E.D., Hila S., Stephany B., et al. Donor kidney volume and outcomes following live donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006; 6: 616.
2. Zeier M., Dohler B., Opelz G., et al. The effect of donor gender on graft survival. Am J Soc. 2002; 13: 2570.
3. Goryainov V.A., Kaabak M.M., Babenko N.N., Morozova M.M., et al. The influence of gender on the results of transplantation of related kidneys. Khirurghia. Zhournal im. N.I. Pirogova [Surgery. Journal named after N.I. Pirogov]. 2016; 6: 62–7. (in Russian)
4. Goryainov V.A., Kaabak M.M., Babenko N.N., Morozova M.M., et al. Predictors for the results of living related donors kidney transplantation. Khirurghia. Zhournal im. N.I. Pirogova [Surgery. The Journal named after N.I. Pirogov]. 2015; 4: 43–7. (in Russian)
5. Kaabak M.M., Goryainov V.A., Zokoev A.K., Babenko N.N., et al. Ten-year experience with early plasmapheresis after kidney transplantation.Vestnik transplantologhii i iskusstvennykh organov [Bulletin of Transplantology and Artificial Organs]. 2009; 11 (1): 28–33. (in Russian)
6. Kaabak M.M., Zokoev A.K., Morozova M.M., Iljinsky I.M. The use of native urether for the restoration of urinary ways iead to the diminuation of chronical transplant nephropathy frequency. Nefrologiya i dializ [Nephrology and Dialysis]. 2002; 4 (4): 250. (in Russian)
7. Sadovnikov V.I., Sandrikov V.A., Kaabak M.M. The effect of plasmapheresis on the function and intraorganic blood flow of the renal allograft in the early postoperative period. Vestnik transplan- tologhii i iskusstvennykh organov [Bulletin of Transplantology and Artificial Organs]. 2003. No 3. С. 21. (in Russian)
8. Csete M. Gender issues in transplantation. Anesth Analges. 2008; 107 (1): 232–8.
9. Mc’Gee J., Magnus J.H., Islam T.M., Jaffe B.M., Zhang R. Donor-recipient gender and size mismatch affects graft success after kidney transplantation. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210 (5): 718–25.
10. Miklos D.B., Kim H.T., Miller K.H., et al. Antibody responses to H-Y minor histocompatibility antigens correlate with chronic graft-versus-host disease and disease remission. Blood. 2005; 105: 2973.
11. Oien C.M., Reiseater A.V., Leivestad T., Pfeffier P., Os I. Gender imbalance among donors in living kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005; Vol. 20: 783–9.