To the content
1 . 2021

Results of combined treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation therapy and a short-course of radiation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk rectal cancer

Abstract

Background. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a potential alternative to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in intermediate-risk rectal cancer patients, helping to avoid the side effects of radiation therapy and may allow early prevention of distant metastasis.

Aim - to study the safety and effectiveness of NACT in patients with intermediate-risk rectal cancer.

Material and methods. Patients with histologically confirmed cancer of the mid-ampullar rectum T2-T3cN1-2M0, T2-4aN1-2M0 and T4aN0M0 of the upper ampullary rectum were included in the retrospective study. All patients of the study group underwent NACT according to the CapOx 4 course scheme. Evaluation of the effect was carried out on the basis of MRI of the small pelvis: in the presence of regression or stabilization, surgical treatment was performed, in the presence of progression, CRT, then surgery. After surgery, all patients were scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy for a total duration of 6 months. Patients in the control group underwent neoadjuvant radiation therapy (25 Gy in fractions of 5 Gy) and then surgery for 4-8 weeks. The primary endpoints included pathological complete response rate (pCR) and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

Results. The study included 117 patients in each group. 113 (96.5%) patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group completed all 4 courses of chemotherapy. In 12 (10.3%) patients in the NACT group a complete pathological response (pCR) was noted, among patients who received only NACT followed by surgery (n=111) pCR was noted in 11 (9.9%) cases. The median follow-up was 36.2 months for both groups. The distant failure rate was 9 (7.7%) in the NACT group and 20 (17.1%) in the control group (p=0.046). There were no local recurrence. The 3-year OS was 90.6 and 92.5% (p=0.857), and the 3-year DFS was 86.1 and 80.8%, respectively (p=0.394).

Conclusion. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for rectal cancer patients with negative prognostic factors.

Keywords:rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy

Funding. The study had no sponsor support.
Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.
For citation: Kochkina S.O., Gordeev S.S., Fedyanin M.Yu., Kozlov N.A., Malikhov A.G., Mamedli Z.Z. Results of combined treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation therapy and a short-course of radiation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk rectal cancer. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky Journal. 2021; 9 (1): 29-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2308-1198-2021-9-1-29-36 (in Russian)

References 

1. Cercek A., Roxburgh C.S.D., Strombom P., Smith J.J., Temple L.K.F., Nash G.M., et al. Adoption of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4 (6): e180071.

2. Cienfuegos J.A., Rodríguez J., Baixauli J., Chopitea A., García-Consuegra A., Abengózar M., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Oncologic outcomes. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2020; 112 (1): 16–22.

3. Al-Sukhni E., Milot L., Fruitman M., Beyene J., Victor J.C., Schmocker S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic re view and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19 (7): 2212-23.

4.    Koizumi M., Yamada T., Shinji S., Yokoyama Y., Takahashi G., Iwai T., et al. Feasibility of neoadjuvant FOLFOX therapy without radiotherapy for baseline resectable rectal cancer. In Vivo. 2018; 32 (4): 937-43.

5. Engstrom P.F., Arnoletti J.P., Benson A.B. 3rd, Chen Y.J., Choti M.A., Cooper H.S., et al.; National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2009; 7 (8): 838-81.

6.    Group E.G.W., Glimelius B. Rectal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2007; 18 (suppl 2): ii23-4.

7.    Glynne-Jones R., Wyrwicz L., Tiret E., Brown G., Ro-del C., Cervantes A., et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and followup. Ann Oncol. 2018; 29 (suppl 4): iv263.

8.    Cho S.H., Choi G.S., Kim G.C., Seo A.N., Kim H.J., Kim W.H., et al. Long-term outcomes of surgery alone versus surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for early T3 rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96 (12): e6362.

9.    Taylor F.G., Quirke P., Heald R.J., Moran B., Blomqvist L., Swift I., et al.; Group Multicenter Study. Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study. Ann Surg. 2011; 253 (4): 711-9.

10.    Abraha I., Aristei C., Palumbo I., Lupattelli M., Tras-tulli S., Cirocchi R., et al. Preoperative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localised rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 10: CD002102.

11.    Zhao F., Wang J., Yu H., Cheng X., Li X., Zhu X., et al. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+ M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20 300 patients. Radiat Oncol. 2020; 15 (1): 49.

12.    Lee J. B., Kim H.S., Jung I., Shin S.J., Beom S.H., Chang J.S., et al. Upfront radical surgery with total mesorectal excision followed by adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (TME-FOLFOX): an open-label, multicenter, phase II randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020; 21 (1): 320.

13.    Wiltink L.M., Chen T.Y., Nout R.A., Kranen-barg E.M., Fiocco M., Laurberg S., et al. Health-related quality of life 14 years after preoperative short-term radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2014; 50 (14): 2390-8.

14.    Martella A., Willett C., Palta M., Czito B. The selective use of radiation therapy in rectal cancer patients. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018; 20 (6): 43.

15. Kusters M., Valentini V., Calvo F., Krempien R., Nieuwenhuijzen G., Martijn H., et al. Results of European pooled analysis of IORT-containing multimodality treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: adjuvant chemotherapy prevents local recurrence rather than distant metastases. Ann Oncol. 2010; 21 (6): 1279-84.

16.    Fernandez-Martos C., Estevan R., Salud A., Pericay C., Gallen M., Sierra E., et al. Neoadjuvant capecitabine, oxliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B) in intermediate-risk rectal cancer (RC) patients defined by magnetic resonance (MR): GEMCAD 0801 trial. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012.

17.    Hasegawa J., Mizushima T., Kim H.M., Miyake Y., Takemoto H., Tamagawa H., et al. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab for locally advanced rectal cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013.

18.    Schrag D., Weiser M. R., Goodman K. A., Gonen M., Hollywood E., Cercek A., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32 (6): 513.

19.    Ishii Y., Hasegawa H., Endo T., Okabayashi K., Ochiai H., Moritani K., et al. Medium-term results of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using irinotecan, 5-fluo-rouracil, and leucovorin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010; 36 (11): 1061-5.

20.    Tomida A., Uehara K., Hiramatsu K., Maeda A., Sakamoto E., Okada Y., et al.; the Nagoya Surgical Oncology Group. Neoadjuvant CAPOX and bevacizumab alone for locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term results from the N-SOG 03 trial. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019; 24 (4): 403-10.

21.    Schwartz L.H., Litiere S., de Vries E., Ford R., Gwyther S., Mandrekar S., et al. RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer. 2016; 62: 132-7.

22.    Dworak O., Keilholz L., Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997; 12 (1): 19-23.

23.    Kamiya T., Uehara K., Nakayama G., Ishigure K., Kobayashi S., Hiramatsu K., et al.; Nagoya Surgical Oncology Group, the Chubu Clinical Oncology Group. Early results of multicenter phase II trial of perioperative oxaliplatin and capecitabine without radiotherapy for high-risk rectal cancer: CORONA I study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42 (6): 829-35.

24.    Uehara K., Hiramatsu K., Maeda A., Sakamoto E., Inoue M., Kobayashi S., et al. Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine and bevacizumab without radiotherapy for poor-risk rectal cancer: N-SOG 03 Phase II trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013; 43 (10): 964-71.

25.    Glynne-Jones R., Hall M.R., Lopes A., Pearce S., Goh V., Bosompem S., et al. BACCHUS: A randomised non-comparative phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Heliyon. 2018; 4 (9): e00804.

26.    Sato K., Miura T., Morohashi S., Sakamoto Y., Morohashi H., Yoshida T., et al. Comparable regional therapeutic effects between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced lower rectal cancer in terms of histopathological analysis. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019; 10 (6): 619-24.

27. Brouwer N.P.M., Stijns R.C.H., Lemmens V., Nag-tegaal I.D., Beets-Tan R.G.H., Futterer J.J., et al. Clinical lymph node staging in colorectal cancer; a flip of the coin? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018; 44 (8): 1241-6.

28.    Mizukami Y., Ueda S., Mizumoto A., Sasada T., Okumura R., Kohno S., et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2011; 35 (4): 895-9.

29. Deng Y., Chi P., Lan P., Wang L., Chen W., Cui L., et al. Neoadjuvant modified FOLFOX6 with or without radiation versus fluorouracil plus radiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: final results of the Chinese FOWARC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37 (34): 3223-33.

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITOR
CHIEF EDITOR
Sergey L. Dzemeshkevich
MD, Professor (Moscow, Russia)

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»