References
1. Lurie F., Creton D., Eklof B. Prospective randomised study of Endovenous Radiofrequency Obliteration (Closure) Versus Ligation and Vein Stripping (EVOLVeS): 2-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42 (1): 67–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.0 4.007
2. Rasmussen L., Lawaetz M., Bjoern L., Vennits B., Blemings A., Eklof B. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011; 98 (8): 1079–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7555
3. Hartmann K. Endovenöse (minimalinvasive) Verfahren zur Therapie der Varikose: Schonende und effektive Alternative zur Stripping-Operation [Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins: The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations]. Hautarzt. 2020; 71 (1): 12–9. (in German). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-019-0 4520-2
4. Morrison N., Gibson K., Vasquez M., Weiss R., Jones A. Five-year extension study of patients from a randomized clinical trial (VeClose) comparing cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020; 8 (6): 978–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.12.080
5. Almeida J., Javier J., Mackay E., Bautista C., Cher D., Proebstle T. Two-year follow-up of first human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology. 2014; 30 (6): 397–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514532455
6. Gibson K., Ferris B. Cyanoacrylate closure of incompetent great, small and accessory saphenous veins without the use of post-procedure compression: Initial outcomes of a postmarket evaluation of the VenaSeal System (the WAVES Study). Vascular. 2016; 25 (2): 149–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538116651014
7. Proebstle T., Alm J., Dimitri S., Rasmussen L., Whiteley M., Lawson J., et al. Three-year follow-up results of the prospective European Multi-center Cohort Study on Cyanoacrylate Embolization for treatment of refluxing great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021; 9 (2): 329–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.05.019
8. Teng M., Chen C., Lirng J., Chen S., Lee L., Chang T. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate for embolisation of carotid aneurysm. Neuroradiology. 1994; 36 (2): 144–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00588084
9. Min R., Almeida J., Mclean D., Madsen M., Raabe R. Novel vein closure procedure using a proprietary cyanoacrylate adhesive: 30-day swine model results. Phlebology. 2012; 27 (8): 398–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2011.011084
10. Vos C., Ünlü Ç., Bosma J., van Vlijmen C., de Nie A., Schreve M. A systematic review and metaanalysis of two novel techniques of nonthermal endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017; 5 (6): 880–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.05.022
11. Bozkurt A., Yılmaz M. A prospective comparison of a new cyanoacrylate glue and laser ablation for the treatment of venous insufficiency. Phlebology. 2016; 31 (1 suppl): 106–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355516632652
12. Proebstle T., Alm J., Dimitri S., Rasmussen L., Whiteley M., Lawson J., et al. The European multicenter cohort study on cyanoacrylate embolization of refluxing great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015; 3 (1): 2–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.09.001
13. Park I. Successful use of VenaSeal system for the treatment of large great saphenous vein of 2.84-cm diameter. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018; 94 (4): 219–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.4.219
14. Shirinbek O., Mnatsakanyan G.V., Odinokova S.N. Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Closure in the Real-World Practice: 2-Year Results of Varicose Vein Treatment. Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia). 2022; 19 (1): 132-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2022-19-1-132-139
15. Сyanoacrylate adhesive closure of truncal saphenous veins. Guidance Manual. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publishing Group, 2022. (in Russian)
16. Morrison N., Gibson K., Vasquez M., Weiss R., Cher D., Madsen M., et al. VeClose trial 12-month outcomes of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017; 5 (3): 321–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.12.005
17. Chan Y.C., Law Y., Cheung G.C., Cheng S.W. Predictors of recanalization for incompetent great saphenous veins treated with cyanoacrylate glue. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28 (5): 665–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.01.011
18. Murzina E.L., Lobastov K.V., Bargandzhiya A.B., Laberko L.A., Popov I.B. Mid-term results of cyanoacrylate embolization of saphenous veins. Flebologiya [Phlebology]. 2020; 14 (4): 311–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo2020140 41311 (in Russian)
19. Belentsov S M. Adhesive technology for the elimination of pathological veno-venous reflux in chronic diseases of the veins of the lower extremities: immediate and long-term results. Ambulatornaya khirurgiya [Outpatient Surgery]. 2021; 18 (1): 48–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2021-18-1-48-54 (in Russian)