To the content
4 . 2023

The comparison results of inguinal hernioplasty with polypropylene and titanized polypropylene meshes: meta-analysis

Abstract

This meta-analysis was conducted to understand the benefits of using titanized polypropylene in inguinal hernioplasty. The postoperative period, the frequency of hernia recurrence with the use of polypropylene and titanized mesh implants were compared.

Aim – to compare the results of inguinal hernia repair with using polypropylene and titanium-containing mesh implants.

Material and methods. After conducting a systematic (network) study, 22 027 English-language publications were found for the period from 1948 to 2022. After selection, 8179 articles were evaluated. The meta-analysis included 6 randomized clinical trials, which included 1758 patients. The quality of articles included in the meta-analysis was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias checklist. Network meta-analysis was performed using the R Statistica program (NetMeta XI package) on the resource “https://crsu.shinyapps.io/MetaInsight/”. The overall effect for dichotomous data was described by a 95% significant interval.

Results. A tendency to improve the results of treatment was revealed when using implants of light and ultralight weight and implants containing a biologically inert material – titanium. This was expressed by a lower incidence of chronic pain syndrome in the late postoperative period. There were no significant differences between the studied materials in terms of postoperative complications, hernia recurrence, and reoperations.

Keywords:meta-analysis; inguinal hernioplasty; polypropylene implants; titanium-containing implant

Funding. The study had no sponsor support.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Gorsky V.A., Ettinger A.P., Ponomarenko A.A., Azimov R.Kh., Shemyatovsky K.A., Glushkov P.S. The comparison results of inguinal hernioplasty with polypropylene and titanized polypropylene meshes: meta-analysis. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky Journal. 2023; 11 (4): 48–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2308-1198-2023-11-4-48-59  (in Russian)

References

1.     Brown C.N., Finch J.G. Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010; 92: 272–8.

2.     Earle D., Romanelli J. Prosthetic materials for hernia: what’s new. Contemp Surg. 2007; 63 (2): 63–9.

3.     Nienhuijs S., Staal E., Stobbe L., Rosman C., Groenewoud H., Bleichrodt R. Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2007; 194: 394–400.

4.     Sarbaeva N.N., Ponomareva Yu.V., Milyakova M.N., Gribkova O.V. Sources of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in the tissue microenvironment of materials for hernioplasty // Byulleten’ eksperimental’noi biologii i meditsiny [Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine]. 2016; 161 (5): 656–66. (in Russian)

5.     Chernov A.V., Ir’yanov Yu.M., Radchenko S.A., Chernov V.F., Ir’yanova T.Yu. The study of the features of the integration of various biomaterials in the soft and bone tissues of the body. Geniy ortopedii [The Genius of Orthopedics]. 2012; (1): 97–101. (in Russian)

6.     Zhu L.-M. Mesh implants: an overview of crucial mesh parameters. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015; 7 (10): 226.

7.     Scheidbach H., Wolff S., Lippert H. Prothetische Materialien in der Bauchwandchirurgie – ein Uberblick. Zentralbl Chir. 2011; 136: 568–74.

8.     Scheidbach H., Tannapfel A., Schmidt U., Lippert H., Köckerling F. Influence of titanium coating on the biocompatibility of a heavyweight polypropylene mesh. Eur Surg Res. 2004; 36: 313–7.

9.     Avtan L., Avci C., Bulut T. Mesh infections after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997; 7: 192–5.

10. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2002; 235: 322–32.

11. Hume R.H., Bour J. Mesh migration following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1996; 6: 333–5.

12. McCormack K., Scott N.W., Go P.M., et al.; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; 1: CD001785.

13. Awad S.S., Fagan S.P. Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2004; 188: 9–16.

14. Bay-Nielsen M., Nilsson E., Nordin P., et al.; Swedish Hernia Data Base the Danish Hernia Data Base. Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males. Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 1372–6.

15. Fortelny R.H., Schwab R., Glaser K.S., Puchner K.U., et al. The assessment of quality of life in a trial on lightweight mesh fixation with fibrin sealant in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. Hernia. 2008; 12: 499–505.

16. McCormack K., Wake B.L., Fraser C., et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review. Hernia. 2005; 9: 109–14.

17. Prassas D., Rolfs T.M., Sirothia N., Schumacher F.J. Lightweight titanium-coated mesh versus standard-weight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP): a cohort analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016; 26 (6): 113–6.

18. Cumpston M., Li T., Page M.J., et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 10: CD000142.

19. Koch A., Bringman S., Myrelid P., Smeds S., Kald A. Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh. Br J Surg. 2008; 95 (10): 1226–31.

20. Schopf S., von Ahnen T., von Ahnen M., Schardey H. Chronic pain after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized comparison of light and extra light titanized polypropylene mesh. World J Surg. 2011; 35 (2): 302–10.

21. Bittner R., Schmedt C.G., Leibl B.J., Schwarz J. Early postoperative and one-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of extra light titanized polypropylene mesh and traditional heavyweight polypropylene mesh on pain and seroma production in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). World J Surg. 2011; 35 (8): 1791–7.

22. Bittner R., Leibl B.J., Kraft B., Schwarz J. One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). Hernia. 2011; 15 (5): 503–10.

23. Peeters E., Spiessens C., Oyen R., De Wever L., et al. Sperm motility after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with lightweight meshes: 3-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial. Hernia. 2014; 18 (3): 361–7.

24. Yang S., Shen Y.M., Wang M.G., Zou Z.Y., Jin C.H., Chen J. Titanium-coated mesh versus standard polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Hernia. 2019; 23 (2): 255–9.

25. Chui L.B., Ng W.T., Sze Y.S., et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 2735–8.

26. Chowbey P.K., Garg N., Sharma A., et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extra-peritoneal groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 3073–9.

27. Schmidbauer S., Ladurner R., Hallfeldt K.K., et al. Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res. 2005; 10: 247–53.

28. Taylor C., Layani L., Liew V., et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation, early results of a large randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 757–62.

29. Schug-Pass C., Tamme C., Tannapfel A., et al. A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20 (3): 402–9.

30. Köckerling F., Schug-Pass C. What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? An evidence-based review of the literature. Hernia. 2014; 18 (4): 445–57.

31. Conze J., Kingsnorth A.N., Flament J.B., et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 1488–93.

32. O’Dwyer P.J., Kingsnorth A.N., Molloy R.G., et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 166–70.

33. Akolekar D., Kumar S., Khan L.R., et al. Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs. Hernia. 2008; 12 (1): 39–43.

17. Prassas D., Rolfs T.M., Sirothia N., Schumacher F.J. Lightweight titanium-coated mesh versus standard-weight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP): a cohort analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016; 26 (6): 113–6.

18. Cumpston M., Li T., Page M.J., et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 10: CD000142.

19. Koch A., Bringman S., Myrelid P., Smeds S., Kald A. Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh. Br J Surg. 2008; 95 (10): 1226–31.

20. Schopf S., von Ahnen T., von Ahnen M., Schardey H. Chronic pain after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized comparison of light and extra light titanized polypropylene mesh. World J Surg. 2011; 35 (2): 302–10.

21. Bittner R., Schmedt C.G., Leibl B.J., Schwarz J. Early postoperative and one-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of extra light titanized polypropylene mesh and traditional heavyweight polypropylene mesh on pain and seroma production in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). World J Surg. 2011; 35 (8): 1791–7.

22. Bittner R., Leibl B.J., Kraft B., Schwarz J. One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). Hernia. 2011; 15 (5): 503–10.

23. Peeters E., Spiessens C., Oyen R., De Wever L., et al. Sperm motility after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with lightweight meshes: 3-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial. Hernia. 2014; 18 (3): 361–7.

24. Yang S., Shen Y.M., Wang M.G., Zou Z.Y., Jin C.H., Chen J. Titanium-coated mesh versus standard polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Hernia. 2019; 23 (2): 255–9.

25. Chui L.B., Ng W.T., Sze Y.S., et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 2735–8.

26. Chowbey P.K., Garg N., Sharma A., et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extra-peritoneal groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 3073–9.

27. Schmidbauer S., Ladurner R., Hallfeldt K.K., et al. Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res. 2005; 10: 247–53.

28. Taylor C., Layani L., Liew V., et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation, early results of a large randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 757–62.

29. Schug-Pass C., Tamme C., Tannapfel A., et al. A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20 (3): 402–9.

30. Köckerling F., Schug-Pass C. What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? An evidence-based review of the literature. Hernia. 2014; 18 (4): 445–57.

31. Conze J., Kingsnorth A.N., Flament J.B., et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 1488–93.

32. O’Dwyer P.J., Kingsnorth A.N., Molloy R.G., et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 166–70.

33. Akolekar D., Kumar S., Khan L.R., et al. Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs. Hernia. 2008; 12 (1): 39–43.

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITOR
CHIEF EDITOR
Sergey L. Dzemeshkevich
MD, Professor (Moscow, Russia)

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»