References
1. Ransford G.A., Moscardi P., Blachman-Braun R., Ballesteros N., Guevara C., Salvitti M., et al. Predictive factors for early discharge (≤24 hours) and re-admission following robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021; 15 (11): E603–7.
2. Passerotti C.C., Passerotti A.M., Dall’Oglio M.F., Leite K.R., Nunes R.L., Srougi M., et al. Comparing the quality of the suture anastomosis and the learning curves associated with performing open, freehand, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a swine animal model. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208 (4): 576–86.
3. Moore L.J., Wilson M.R., Waine E., Masters R.S., McGrath J.S., Vine S.J. Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy. J Robot Surg. 2015; 9 (1): 67–73.
4. Finkelstein J.B., Van Batavia J.P., Casale P. Is outpatient robotic pyeloplasty feasible? J Robot Surg. 2016; 10 (3): 233–7.
5. Fichtenbaum E.J., Strine A.C., Concodora C.W., Schulte M., Noh P.H. Tubeless outpatient robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction in the pediatric population: short-term assessment of safety. J Robot Surg. 2018; 12 (2): 257–60.
6. Efremenkov A.M., Sokolov Yu.Yu., Koroleva O.V., Popov A.M., Kirgizov I.V., Shatokhin M.N. Robot-assisted plastic of the pelvis-ureter segment of the ureter in a child. First experience. Kremlevskaya meditsina. Klinicheskiy vestnik [Kremlin Medicine. Clinical Bulletin]. 2023; (1): 82–5. (in Russian)
7. Mei H., Tang S. Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: current situation and future prospectives. Front Pediatr. 2023; 11: 1120831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1120831 PMID: 36865692; PMCID: PMC9971628.
8. Cundy T.P., Harley S.J.D., Marcus H.J., Hughes-Hallett A., Khurana S. Global trends in paediatric robot-assisted urological surgery: a bibliometric and Progressive Scholarly Acceptance analysis. J Robot Surg. 2018; 12 (1): 109–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0703-3 Epub 2017 Apr 28. PMID: 28455800.
9. Sung G.T., Gill I.S., Hsu T.H. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology. 1999; 53 (6): 1099–103.
10. Gettman M.T., Neururer R., Bartsch G., Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology. 2002; 60 (3): 509–13.
11. Olsen L.H., Jorgensen T.M. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 2004; 171 (6 pt 2): 2629–31.
12. Atug F., Woods M., Burgess S.V., Castle E.P., Thomas R. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005; 174 (4 pt 1): 1440–2.
13. Morales-López R.A., Pérez-Marchán M., Pérez Brayfield M. Current concepts in pediatric robotic assisted pyeloplasty. Front Pediatr. 2019; 7: 4.
14. Song S.H., Lee C., Jung J., Kim S.J., Park S., Park H., et al. A comparative study of pediatric open pyeloplasty, laparoscopy-assisted extracorporeal pyeloplasty, and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (4): e0175026.
15. Avery D.I., Herbst K.W., Lendvay T.S., Noh P.H., Dangle P., Gundeti M.S., et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multi-institutional experience in infants. J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11 (3): 139.e1–5.
16. Kafka I.Z., Kocherov S., Jaber J., Chertin B. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter? Pediatr Surg Int. 2019; 35 (3): 391–6.
17. Esposito C., Cerulo M., Lepore B., Coppola V., D’Auria D., Esposito G., et al. Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Robot Surg. 2023; 7 (4): 1239–46.
18. Rowe C.K., Pierce M.W., Tecci K.C., Houck C.S., Mandell J., Retik A.B., et al. A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive? J Endourol. 2012; 26 (7): 871–7.